SANTA ANA, Calif.—A former Anaheim police officer was acquitted Aug. 3 of lying on a police report to justify searching a suspect’s vehicle.
Dillon Adam Avila, 30, was found not guilty of one felony count of a police officer filing a false report. Prosecutors dismissed a felony count of perjury on July 20, according to court records.
Jurors deliberated for about four hours before reaching a verdict, his attorney, Michael D. Schwartz said.
“He was very relieved,” Schwartz told City News Service.
Schwartz argued that prosecutors failed to prove who actually filed the police report in question. There wasn’t enough evidence to show whether Avila or his partner filed it, Schwartz said.
“It could have been either one—there’s no way of knowing,” Schwartz said.
The perjury claim was likely dismissed because Avila, who testified at the preliminary hearing, relied on the police report and not his own memory, which is routine in criminal cases, Schwartz said.
Three character witnesses who testified also bolstered the ex-officer’s case, Schwartz said, and one of the character witnesses has been a friend of the officer since age 5
“Obviously, we thank God for the verdict, but he has to rebuild his life now,” Schwartz said. “He has been vindicated of any criminal accusations, but he still has to rebuild his life.”
Avila and his partner at the time, Officer Samuel Silva, pulled over a suspect for expired registration on Walnut Street at about 11 p.m. April 29, 2018, Deputy District Attorney Jake Jondle said in his opening statement of the trial.
Kevin Vincent Hodges, who was behind the wheel, and his passenger, Elizabeth Caro, were asked to get out of the 1991 Lexus they were in, according to court records.
Avila “falsely claimed Mr. Hodges gave consent for a search,” Jondle alleged.
Jondle showed jurors body-camera footage at the scene showing Hodges refusing a search of the car.
At another time he is shown saying, “I told you I’m not consenting to the search.”
Avila is seen in the footage acknowledging Hodges’ statement.
“He says, ‘I know you said no to the searches,'” Jondle said.
Avila was accused of writing in the report that Hodges consented to a search of his backpack, which led to the discovery of evidence that resulted in Hodges being charged with possession of drugs for sale, Jondle said.
During a preliminary hearing for Hodges on Feb. 5, 2019, Avila testified that Hodges consented to the search of his car, Jondle said.
Hodges’ attorney, Stephan DeSales, argued in a motion to suppress evidence that Avila is recorded on bodycam video telling Hodges, “We heard you. You said you did not want us to search it.”
Hodges told the police officers he had many possessions in his car because he was in the process of moving and that he misplaced his wallet so he could not provide an ID to the officers, according to DeSales.
The officers found his wallet and driver’s license before they searched the backpack and trunk, which led to the evidence resulting in the drug charges, DeSales said.
Prosecutors ultimately moved to dismiss the case against Hodges on Feb. 21, 2020.
Schwartz told jurors Aug. 1, “As a society, we have to understand police officers are human beings, not robocops. … This case is not about a false police report. It’s about a sloppy, poorly written police report.”
The two officers were working the “graveyard shift”—a work shift that starts late at night—when they pulled over Hodges, who had been seen leaving a “known drug house” that dealt meth, Schwartz said.
Avila was busy talking to Caro as Silva dealt with Hodges, so Avila wasn’t always aware of what Hodges was saying to Silva at the time, Schwartz said.
Schwartz said the fact that Hodges could not produce his driver’s license could have led to an arrest on that alone. It would have also led to the car being towed and searched legally without the owner’s consent, Schwartz said.
The officers also spotted a knife in Hodges’ pocket, which also could have led to an arrest on the spot, Schwartz said.
He said if they placed him under arr...